Pupil transportation

It’s nearly a wrap – special session coming to a quick conclusion

The second special session of 2011 is quickly coming to a close.  Surprising to just about everyone, including the press who were reporting yesterday that the legislature would conclude possibly by Friday or Saturday, it looks to me like it will end today.

The agreed to cuts/changes/fund transfers, the most significant of which is the $50 million delay of school bus purchasing payments by 10 months, have not faced a serious challenge on either the House or Senate floor.  Yes there were those who argued that not enough was done to cut, and those who argued not enough was done to raise revenue, however in the end, the sentiment at the outset that not much would get done, turned out to be accurate. A final note is that higher education escaped without any cuts!

I’ll update this once the final gavel goes down and the bills are sent to the Governor.

Update: Sine die at 3:45 pm.  Now we get to enjoy the holiday break and recharge our batteries for the upcoming 2012 session which begins on January 9.  Enjoy your holidays!!!

Leave a comment

Initial agreement on cuts could be worse

It appears that the House and Senate have reached a general agreement on initial cuts/fund transfers/caseload changes so that they take care of $500 million of the $2 billion budget shortfall. There are no cuts to higher education but one change will affect the purchase of school buses: a 10 month delay on the state’s payments for new bus purchases (this delay saves the budget $49 million).

Otherwise not much to get too excited about. However, those who would like more details, here they are.

The House Ways and Means committee will be hearing the agreement today.  You can expect there will be small changes to the agreement along the way as it makes it through the House and Senate and then to the Governor’s desk.  The hope is that they will conclude their work no later than this coming Saturday, the 17th.

UPDATE: The public hearing consisted of approximately 5 individuals with very few critical comments.  Chairman Hunter commented that he was surprised there was so little comment (he took that as a positive silent statement of support for the changes).

Leave a comment

Senate considering delay of transportation vehicle funding

On Monday, the Senate Ways and Means committee considered a bill to delay school district funding for replacement of old school busses.  The impact of that change will keep older busses on the road longer, increase school district maintenance costs, and will take money from the school district general fund if the school district has to replace the bus earlier than expected.

SB 5476 was originally proposed by Governor Gregoire as a funding mechanism for the school transportation funding formula.  What it would have done is take approximately $90 million from school bus purchasing and place that money in operating costs.  PSE was supportive of this proposal but unfortunately, school district transportation officials didn’t like it.  Boy, was that a mistake that I hope we will not have to live with.

The House ignored the Governor’s proposal.  On the other hand, the Senate kept it alive and used $90 million not to fund transportation but to fund other state budget priorities.

PSE opposes the bill because it gives an unfair advantage to transportation subcontractors and because we want the Senate to spend the $90 million on classified employee issues still on the negotiating table: the new transportation formula, reducing a potential classified employee salary cut, and providing half time or more state funded insurance benefits for those bargaining units that go into a state health care program.

Here is the testimony from last Monday’s hearing:

Leave a comment

Bus cameras coming soon

Yesterday, PSE’s bill to give bus drivers another tool to enforce the laws while loading and unloading students, passed the House 93-3 (the no’s were Condotta, Shea, Overstreet).

We have one final hurdle before it goes to the Governor.  That hurdle is “concurrence” from the Senate that they agree with the House amendments (they will agree).

It’s not too early to acknowledge those who played critical roles in this bill’s passage.

Special recognition should be given to our member Brennor Beck, the Peninsula school district bus driver who sparked this legislation and provided excellent testimony during hearings.

Senator Hobbs was our prime sponsor and made this bill possible.  He surprised us by helping out at various stages of moving this bill and was the lead public relations guy for the bill (he was interviewed numerous times, for instance he was on the Ken Schram radio show 3 times (I think that is on KIRO radio), Q13 TV, the Everett Herald.)

And finally, Ehren Flygare did a great job keeping the bill moving through the Rules and Floor.

I am proud to have participated in this good team effort. 

Here is the video of the debate and vote:

Leave a comment

Another positive response for bus safety

Yesterday, the House Transportation Committee, heard PSE’s bill to provide student’s more safety while getting to school and returning home, and, at the same time, take the burden off bus driver’s to enforce traffic safety laws.

The committee was actively engaged in the discussion of the bill, and, the testimony was received very well.

Brennor Beck, Peninsula school district bus driver, again provided excellent testimony.  He followed that up today, Thursday, at 10:30 am by appearing on the Dave Ross show on KIRO radio.  A big thanks to Brennor for his time, effort, and great representation of bus drivers!

Testimony can be found here:

and here:

Posted by: Doug Nelson on 3/17/2011 at 11:58:00 PM

Leave a comment

Couple of “Old Ideas” Just Surfaced

Not a huge surprise that as we emerge from the first week of legislative pomp and circumstance, legislators are starting to pull out old ideas that haven’t passed in previous sessions for another try.  Two of those, school bus advertising and school district consolidation, were just introduced in the House and Senate.  HB 1325, sponsored by long time advocate Representative Sam Hunt, D., 22nd legislative district, sets up a panel (with a teachers representative but not a classified employee representative) to come up with recommendations to reduce the number of school districts to 150.  We’ll get more into this issue if it appears that it has “legs” (starts to work its way through the legislative process).

School bus advertising is also on the books this year with SB 5220.  Sponsored this year (and last year) by Senator Paull Shin, 21st District Democrat with other co-sponsors Senator McAuliffe, 1st District democrat and Senator Tom, 48th District democrat.  Last year’s bill barely passed out of the Senate committee so we will see how far it makes it this year.  PSE’s online poll indicated a fairly even split amongst our members whether this was good or bad idea.

Posted by: Doug Nelson on 1/19/2011 at 2:19:00 PM

Leave a comment

Other K 12 financial improvements in House budget

If you have looked at some of the previous spreadsheets detailing the positives and negatives of either the House or Senate budget, it is hard not to notice that the House followed through on a couple of very important subjects for us.

Levy Equalization

The House not only fully funded levy equalization, it also included funding for the additional 2% levy equalization increase if SHB 2893 is passed.

Quality Education Council (QEC) Recommendations

In order to improve the funding for school transportation and the funding formulas, the State needs to provide seed money to develop the infrastructure so these new formulas can start up September 1, 2011.  The House provided the necessary funds ($2.5 million) to get both of these new formulas up and running.   The Senate only provided funding for the funding formulas.

Posted by: Doug Nelson on 2/24/2010 at 1:02:00 AM

Leave a comment

19 days left status report

Legislators are taking a slight break from their legislative duties to go back home and check in with constituents.  When they return on Monday, there will be only 17 days left in the session scheduled to adjourn on March 11.  At this stage of the session, it is hard to believe they will put everything together so they can finish on time, but it’s my guess they will.

PSE’s legislative agenda is progressing nicely with one exception: whether the ratio improvements we have made over the last several years will continue.

PSE Bills

First the part of our agenda that is going well; PSE’s bills!  Our higher education bill, E2SHB 1560 is in the Senate now and will be heard on Monday.  There appears to be good support for the bill.  However, a couple of friendly amendments are being considered; however, they will be dropped if they end up causing problems.

Our partial service credit bill, HB 1541, is sitting in the Senate Ways and Means committee.  We expect it to receive their approval sometime in the next week. Finally, PSE’s school crosswalk safety bills, SHB 2739 and SSB 6363, are scheduled for hearings on Thursday and Friday of next week.  We expect either one or both to be approved by the committees.  Since there are two identical bills, one from the House and one from the Senate, the leaders will have to decide which one will get final approval.  We expect that decision to be made some time next week.

Levy Bills

Now onto other big issues that we have been working on.  Two levy bills remain: 2SHB 2670 and SHB 2893.  PSE prefers 2893 because it includes a 4% temporary levy lift, a 2% levy equalization increase, and includes “phantom revenue” (e.g., 728 and 732 funds) in the levy base.  2670 only includes “phantom revenue”.

Tuition Setting Authority

A similar issue in higher education is also still in play.  A tuition setting authority bill, ESSB 6562, is in the House Higher Education committee and faces an uncertain future.  It would allow UW, WSU, and WWU to raise tuition on a temporary basis.

Furlough Bill

The furlough bill, SSB 6503, which would institute cuts in state agencies and higher education institutions, is mired in political struggles and is most likely going to continue in that status until the end of the legislative session.

Cuts/Revenue/Initiative 960

The cuts versus revenue discussions continue with the approval of ESSB 6130 in the House.  6130 temporarily suspends Intitiative 960 and is a precursor to tax increases that will be approved by the legislature.  Which tax increase will be approved?  There are many different suggestions with no clear indication which one is the leading horse in the race.  PSE has been advocating for not only the temporary suspension but also additional revenue in order to avoid even more painful cuts to the education services we provide students.

Sharing Leave

Sharing leave with employees who have run out of sick leave will take on more interest if ESSB 6724 is passed; all indications are that it will.  It would allow state employees to share their sick leave with K 12 employees, and, vice versa.  I have to emphasize that this will be allowed and not required.  Currently, school employees can only share with other school employees in the district, and state employees can only share with state employees.

Another feature of the bill will allow the employee to receive up to 261 days of shared leave if they have less than 10 years of service, 522 days if they have 10 – 19 years of services, and 783 days if they have 20 years or more service.

Education Reform

Now onto the more difficult issues, those that are not going well.  The two remaining education reform bills, SHB2776 and 2SSB6760, leave out the increased funding for classified education support employees that PSE has fought so hard to get over the last several years.  Of the two bills, we much prefer 2776 because it makes commitments to improve the transportation funding formula stating in 2011 as well as enhances many other features of state funding.  Unfortunately, it leaves out the enhancement to classified employees.

Budget

First comes the Senate budget; rumors are that it will be brought out on Monday or Tuesday.  Most guesses are that the Senate will not be kind to education.  The level of cuts will be dependent upon how much federal revenue they will be counting on receiving (the current estimate is around $400 million), and, how much additional State revenue we will receive through increased taxes.  A Senator told me yesterday that they were planning on solving the $2.8 billion problem with 2/3 of additional revenue and 1/3 in cuts.  However, he was quick to note that this could all change by Monday.

Soon after the Senate produces their budget, the House will present their budget.  We expect their budget to be better to education.  But even that budget will include some education cuts so we can’t feel all that good about it.

Posted by: Doug Nelson on 2/20/2010 at 1:04:00 PM

Leave a comment

Comparison of education finance proposals

The League of Education Voters (LEV), the leading advocacy group in favor of broad school accountability and funding reform, this week distributed a side-by-side comparison of the various financing bills.

The LEV spreadsheet compares SHB 2776 and SSB 6760 in the form that they passed out of the respective legislative policy committees.

Regarding classified school staff, the Senate bill removed the commitment to fund pupil transportation, does not include the K-3 class size enhancement, and fails to fully implement all-day kindergarten.

Some of these provisions were included in SSB 6761, which failed to be voted out of the Senate Ways & Means Committee.

Posted by: Rick Chisa on 2/12/2010 at 1:43:00 PM

Leave a comment

School bus advertising to raise revenue for schools

It is almost comical to think that the legislature is so desperate to raise revenue that they are seriously considering allowing advertising on school busses.  Never mind that it doesn’t really raise that much  money (estimated to raise anywhere from $175,000 – $525,000 between all 295 school districts).   At this morning’s Senate Early Learning and K 12 committee, the committee in a disjointed vote, approved the bill, SB 6466, with some amendments.  Hard to tell what they finished with because it was somewhat messy as some Senators spoke against the amendments and the bill, but ended up voting for the bill after the amendments failed.  The vote should have been 4-4 but 2 Senators voted for it just to get it out of committee.

PSE’s position is the same as it was years ago when this issue was raised.  We don’t feel that a school bus should be used as an advertisement for anything other than safe transportation of students.  We are joined in this effort by the Washington Association of Pupil Transportation, WSSDA, WASA, the Principals association, and others.  The funny thing is, no school district is requesting the option to advertise.  We have yet to figure out where this is coming from but we will keep digging to find out.

Our other position is that if they are so keen on advertising, why don’t they encourage districts to increase their current advertising at sports events.  Say for instance, sell the naming rights to the sports stadium or sports gym.  At least in those circumstances, they won’t be starting off on a new path to commercializing the education system.

We also raise the point that in 1997 we had to pass a bill to allow school districts to put a bumper sticker on a bus announcing that illegal passing of the pass equals a $307 fine.  Then in 2002, we had to pass a bill to put a United States flag decal on a school bus.  But when it gets to advertising, school districts will be allowed to make these decisions that used to be made by the legislature.

My question is: Do bus drivers support advertising on school busses?  Let me know your feelings.  I am considering putting together an on-line survey to determine how they feel about this.  Until I do, let me know.

Posted by: Doug Nelson on 1/27/2010 at 9:36:00 PM

Leave a comment