Paraeducators

Paraeducator bill needs your voice of support

Whew! What an eye-opening adventure and learning experience my Legislative Internship has been so far. Thankfully, I have Doug’s wisdom and Ehren’s personal connections to guide and lead me to some pretty surprising experiences, one of those being a personal, 1:1, after-hours sit-down with one of our biggest champions, Senator Ann Rivers my first day here.

As Doug blogged last week, the Para Educator Bill (SB5070) passed 37-12 after a bewildering and mind-boggling series of events.  However, this doesn’t mean we’ve hit a homerun yet and there still is lots of hard work to do to counteract very strong opposition by some of our lobbying friends to ensure its passage.

How do we do this you ask? Well, one of my biggest takeaways yesterday was that trust and money + highly involved membership often times far outstrips long and hard work at developing relationships.  However, the little guys can overtake the big guys if they bank on trusting relationships and step up and get their voices heard.

This is where Senator Rivers and meeting with her comes into play. She is our champion, we have a STRONG relationship of TRUST with her and she is fiercely passionate about seeing our Para Educators have the opportunities to develop professionally to best assist our students and teachers. She needs our help NOW to get the message through to our Legislators that this bill is vitally important to us and for our schools and we, PSE, support its passage. We, as PSE members in solidarity, can help her by making our voices heard.  My PSE Brothers and Sisters, I humbly ask that you contact your Legislators NOW by calling (Leg Hotline 800-562-6000)or email them to ask for their support of SB 5070. We may be the “little guy” on the field but if we come together – our voices can be incredibly loud and mighty.

Did you like this? Share it:
Leave a comment

Paraeducators continue to enjoy strong Senate support

In a strong bi-partisan vote, the Senate approved a comprehensive paraeducator development program.  SB 5070 passed on a 37-12 vote and will require standards, professional development, a career ladder, an easier path to teacher certification, and, training for teachers who supervise paraeducators.

What’s next? It goes to the House for consideration.  And not to confuse you too much but the Senate will now consider the watered down House version – HB 1115.  We are encouraging the Senate to amend 1115 to look like 5070; and in the House we are encouraging them to approve 5070 without amendments.

Did you like this? Share it:
Leave a comment

Intern experiences ups and downs of legislative process

You’re at the big game. Your team is looking solid. Barring any mistakes they stand a good chance of pulling it off. All of a sudden you see the other team set up a play that sets your team back on its heels, the momentum shifts and BAM! it’s over.

That is a bit how today felt. Doug, Ehren, and I spent our entire day meeting with legislators, keeping the interest of PSE members at the forefront of their minds and working to make sure Paraeducators get the training and recognition they deserve. We had received word that the Senate’s version of the paraeducator bill (SB5070) would be coming up for a vote. Doug and I settled into the gallery to watch how the vote unfolded when there was a ruckus on the floor, adjournment was called, and BAM! they were done for the day. Talk about whiplash.

 

Wednesday is the cutoff for bills to make it through to the next step. Missing the cutoff is not necessarily a death sentence for a bill but it does put it on very tenuous footing. Given that the prime sponsor is Republican Senator Ann Rivers, and the Republicans control the Senate, there is still a good chance there will be a vote on this bill. We will be watching very closely over the next couple of days.

Did you like this? Share it:
Leave a comment

House approves weakened paraeducator bill

In a vote of 93-5, the House approved HB 1115, PSE’s paraeducator bill.  Before doing so, they added another amendment to give districts more flexibility when they will provide the required training to paraeducators.  Paraeducators hired on or before September 1 must be trained by September 30.  For paraeducators hired after September 1 in a district that has more than 10,000 students, the district must train the paraeducator within 4 months.  School districts with fewer than 10,000 students would have until the next September 1 to train paraeducators hired after September 1.

The bill now heads to the Senate for it’s consideration.

Did you like this? Share it:
Leave a comment

Robust paraeducator bill heading to Senate floor

The Senate Ways and Means committee just approved SB 5070, PSE’s bill to implement statewide paraeducator standards, professional development and career ladder.  With their action, it looks like the House and Senate will be considering paraeducator bills next week; the House will be considering the weaker version, the Senate the robust version.

Did you like this? Share it:
Leave a comment

Paraeducators part of school facilities shortage solution

In yesterday’s debate of House democrats McCleary solution bill, HB 1843, Republican Matt Mannweller proposed an amendment to address K 3 class size.  His amendment would allow school districts who receive funds to reduce K 3 class-size may use that funding to hire other “school-based personnel who provide direct services to students” if they don’t have classrooms for teachers.   I was surprised when a democratic speaker said they would support the amendment and one reason why is because it would allow hiring paraeducators when classrooms were not available.  The amendment passed unanimously.

Did you like this? Share it:
Leave a comment

Paraeducator board approved

Yesterday, the House Appropriations committee approved a watered down version of PSE’s paraeducator  bill, SHB 1115.  At least they kept the paraeducator board in place with responsibilities to among other things, develop “standards of practice”, specialty certificates, and awarding training grants.  The standards and specialty certificates are voluntary so it would be up to us to convince school districts to implement them.  There is a reference to 32 hours of state funded training to help paraeducators meet the “standards of practice” but that will depend upon the state budget. If the state doesn’t fund the training, it is unlikely school districts will provide the training.

1115 now heads for a vote on the House floor.  The companion bill, SB 5070, has yet to move out of the Senate Ways and Means committee.

Did you like this? Share it:
Leave a comment

Paraeducator bills moving

Both House and Senate fiscal committees are hearing and scheduling the paraeducator bills in their respective committees.  Last Tuesday, the Senate Ways and Means committee heard SB 5070 with only two people testifying; one opposed, one supported.  I presented the pro position, WEA’s chief lobbyist, Lucinda Young provided the opposition testimony.  I was pleased with the continued support of the State PTA, the League of Education Voters, Stand for Children, and the ARC of King County.  Since this committee has already supported this bill the last two legislative sessions, I expect they will vote it out of committee next week.

Next week, the House Appropriations committee is hearing and voting on HB 1115.  However, they will be voting on the amended version that severely weakens the original bill.  Voluntary standards, voluntary training, and little state recognition for the critical instructional role paraeducators play, especially with students who need assistance to succeed in school, continues to be what our opposition prefer.

 

Did you like this? Share it:
Leave a comment

House weakens paraeducator development program, … again

The House education committee continued its 3 year tradition of weakening PSE’s paraeducator bill, HB 1115 yesterday.  They amended the bill by replacing all the recommendations of the paraeducator advisory workgroup (that’s what was in PSE’s bill) and replacing it with voluntary standards for paraeducators (other than the Title I current requirements) even in the special education and bilingual programs.  And the training program is dependent upon state funding for paraeducator professional development.  Which means, no state funding, no training.

Disappointed but hopeful that Senate Republicans will be able to help us by passing and sticking with a stronger version of the paraeducator development program.

 

 

Did you like this? Share it:
Leave a comment

McCleary testimony – snowed in

I was unable to testify at last Monday’s House Appropriations committee hearing on HB 1843/SB 5607 because I was snowed in.  Below is what I sent to committee members after the hearing which captures what I would have said on behalf of PSE’s 30,000 classified employees had I been at the hearing:

PSE signed in support of both bills because each of them have positive impacts on classified school employees.

What we like in 1843:

• Increasing the classified employee salary allocation
• Professional development for classified employees

What we would like to see changed in 1843:

• Change the classified employee basic education funding formula so that the state, not local levies, are paying for 5,000 classified employee FTEs (see this chart).
• Change levy system to promote levy equity

What we like in 5607:

• The state will be fully funding classified employee services (5,000 FTE are currently funded by local levies)
• Implementing a comprehensive paraeducator development program
• More flexibility to hire paraeducators as teachers
• Housing allowance includes classified employees
• Implements the 3:1 insurance payment ratio so that employees with families pay $3 for every $1 a single employee pays
• Levy changes that promote levy equity

What we would like to see changed in 5607:

• 3 year implementation of 3:1 insurance ratio so that in the first year it would be 5:1, second year, 4:1, and third year, 3:1.
• Use the Seattle CPI (consumer price index) as the inflation index rather than the National IPD (implicit price deflator).
• Include an insurance inflation factor that reflect premium increases.
• The requirement that school expenses for compensation not go beyond 80% will harm classified employees since teachers will consume whatever capacity school districts have to spend money. Change this so that classified employees are not left out of staffing, salary, or benefit capacity.

Yesterday, the Appropriations committee voted 1843 out of committee on a partisan vote of 18-15.

Did you like this? Share it:
Leave a comment